• The adopted UN resolution, with US involvement, faced allegations of weakening language critical of Israel’s actions in Gaza, leading to concerns about compromised aid efforts amid a continuously expanding humanitarian crisis.
• Allegations of US interference in the UN resolution process highlight a perceived double standard in its approach to Gaza, contrasting with its stance on Russia in Ukraine.
The recent United Nations Security Council resolution aimed at increasing humanitarian aid to Gaza has been marred by allegations of the United States compromising the language and delaying crucial assistance, while Israel’s relentless offensive draws condemnation for its devastating impact on the besieged Gaza Strip.
Despite urgent international calls for a ceasefire, the resolution, which sought to establish “conditions for a sustainable cessation of hostilities,” faced significant setbacks as the United States reportedly exerted pressure to dilute language critical of Israel’s actions. The resolution ultimately passed with 13 votes in favor, none against, and abstentions from both the United States and Russia.
US Ambassador to the UN, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, touted the resolution as a success, stating, “This was tough, but we got there.” However, critics argue that the US’s role in weakening the resolution impedes the global community’s ability to effectively address the severe humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
Intense negotiations transpired over the past week, with accusations that the US actively sought to water down language that could hold Israel accountable. The original draft called for increased UN control over aid deliveries into Gaza and an “urgent and sustainable cessation of hostilities.” However, the adopted resolution opted for less stringent language on a ceasefire and preserved Israel’s control over all aid.
Before the vote, Russia proposed an amendment to fortify the language around a ceasefire, claiming that the draft resolution had been “neutered” by US intervention. Russia’s UN Ambassador, Vassily Nebenzia, warned that approving the resolution would essentially grant Israeli armed forces unrestricted freedom of movement for further operations in Gaza.
Critics have vehemently accused the United States of applying a glaring double standard in its approach to the hostilities in Gaza. While the US condemns Russia for alleged violations of international law in Ukraine, it continues to provide unwavering support for Israel, even in the face of similar accusations regarding its conduct in Gaza.
The delay in delivering aid to Gaza has sparked widespread concern, with UN chief Antonio Guterres emphasising the significant obstacles created by Israel’s offensive, hindering the distribution of much-needed humanitarian aid. Aid groups stress that a truly effective operation requires security, safe working conditions for staff, logistical capacity, and the resumption of commercial activity—all of which are currently nonexistent.
