In this compelling examination, Steven Smith presents an engaging narrative woven with a speck of humour, shedding light on the unraveling of public discourse in America. Contrary to popular belief, he argues that this decline is not attributed to the prominence of religion but rather to the limitations imposed by secular rationalism.
Interestingly, Smith points out that even passionate secularists inadvertently incorporate metaphysical and theological assumptions into seemingly secular discussions. This perspective offers a nuanced insight, diverging from the common narrative observed in debates between secularists and theists and academic forums. In such exchanges, secularists frequently assert that religion’s societal presence is sustained solely by the principles of secularism. Here we see, rather religion provides secularism with much of its social cohesion.
Smith explores how academia deliberately avoids recognising some of the ethical religious underpinnings of Western civilisation while employing masked substitutes.
He provides a critical analysis of the harm principle’s application in contemporary discourse. Smith scrutinises its effectiveness and the degree to which it is rigorously adhered to, particularly within the realms of public policy and legal adjudication. His inquiry reveals inconsistencies or deficiencies in its application, highlighting the contentious debates and controversial outcomes that may ensue.
Smith carefully scrutinises the inadequacies of secularism in offering a robust moral foundation. He emphasises the necessity of exploring religion to establish such norms, while also advocating for increased transparency in articulating value systems.
The paradox of secularists projecting an image of openness while remaining closed-off highlights the urgency of advocating for genuine openness and introspection as Smith suggests.
